小清河沿岸土壤中多环芳烃的污染特征、来源解析及生态风险评价

车文璐; 毛琼彬; 于双; 孟玲; 武涵; 安康; 徐希柱; 李元成

引用本文:	车文璐,毛琼彬,于双,孟玲,武涵,安康,徐希柱,李元成.小清河沿岸土壤中多环芳烃的污染特征、来源解析及生态风险评价[J].环境监控与预警,2024,16(4):40-46
	CHE Wenlu,MAO Qiongbin,YU Shuang,MENG Ling,WU Han,AN Kang,XU Xizhu,LI Yuancheng.Pollution Characteristics，Source Apportionment and Ecological Risk Assessment of Polycyclic-Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soils along the Xiaoqing River[J].Environmental Monitoring and Forewarning,2024,16(4):40-46

【打印本页】【HTML】【下载PDF全文】【查看/发表评论】【EndNote】【RefMan】【BibTex】

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览高级检索

本文已被：浏览 1840次下载 798次	码上扫一扫！
分享到：微信更多字体:加大+\|默认\|缩小-
小清河沿岸土壤中多环芳烃的污染特征、来源解析及生态风险评价
车文璐¹，毛琼彬¹，于双²，孟玲¹，武涵¹，安康¹，徐希柱¹，李元成^1*
1.山东第一医科大学（山东省医学科学院），公共卫生与健康管理学院，山东济南 250117； 2.山东水岳检验检测有限公司，山东泰安 271016

摘要:

为探究山东省小清河流域土壤中多环芳烃（PAHs）的污染特征、来源及生态风险，于2021年6—7月采集了小清河沿岸30份土壤样品，利用气相色谱-质谱联用法（GC-MS）测定其中16种优先控制PAHs的质量分数，采用特征组成比值法和主成分分析法对PAHs来源进行解析，采用风险商值法进行生态风险评价。结果表明，16种PAHs在所有样品中均有检出，总质量分数为59.07～800.86 ng/g，平均值为194.64 ng/g；其组成以高环PAHs为主，平均占比为：高环（45.70%）＞中环（30.24%）＞低环（24.06%）；石油、煤和生物质燃烧源是土壤样品中PAHs的主要来源；7种致癌性PAHs是生态风险的主要来源，其中苯并（a）芘（BaP）和二苯并（a，h）蒽（DBA）的贡献最高；该研究区域土壤中PAHs生态风险较低，但个别采样点污染较重，加之小清河即将复航的影响，须重点关注潜在生态风险。

关键词: 多环芳烃土壤来源解析风险评价小清河

DOI：DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-6732.2024.04.004

分类号:X825

基金项目:山东省自然科学基金青年项目（ZR2021QB126）；山东第一医科大学学生SRTP项目（2022104391105，202310439047）

Pollution Characteristics，Source Apportionment and Ecological Risk Assessment of Polycyclic-Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soils along the Xiaoqing River

CHE Wenlu¹， MAO Qiongbin¹， YU Shuang²， MENG Ling¹， WU Han¹， AN Kang¹， XU Xizhu¹， LI Yuancheng^1*

1.School of Public Health， Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Science， Jinan， Shandong 250117， China； 2.Shandong Shuiyue Test and Analysis Co.，Ltd.，Taian， Shandong 271016， China

Abstract:

To investigate the characteristics， sources， and ecological risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons（PAHs） in the soil of the Xiaoqing River Basin in Shandong Province， 30 soil samples along the river were collected in June to July， 2021. The content of 16 priority-controlled PAHs was determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry（GC-MS）. The sources of PAHs were analyzed through characteristic composition ratio method and principal component analysis method， and risk quotient method was used for ecological risk assessment. The results showed that all 16 PAHs were detected in all samples， total concentrations ranged from 59.07 to 800.86 ng/g， with an average of 194.64 ng/g. High-ring PAHs dominated the composition， with an average proportion of high-ring（45.70%）>medium-ring（30.24%）>low-ring（24.06%）. Fossil fuel， coal， and biomass combustion were the main contributors to PAHs in the samples. Seven carcinogenic PAHs were the primary sources of ecological risk， with BaP and DBA contributing the most. Compared to other studies， the ecological risk of PAHs in the soil of the study area was relatively low， but some individual sampling points showed heavier contamination. More attention should be paid to potential ecological risk due to the reorientation plan on Xiaoqing River.

Key words: PAHs Soil Source apportionment Risk assessment Xiaoqing River